Read Euractiv’s interview with @ceps.eu about how transparency essential for developing trustworthy AI #aicodeproject eurac.tv/9Ygu
A5. Could go either way, if only big platforms control the AI, we may see more “gatekeepers” deciding what is true. Europe is trying to avoid that: AI-CODE services are designed so journalists & fact-checkers (not just platforms) test and shape tools. #aicodeproject
A2. AI is great at scale + speed. It clusters narratives, flags coordinated campaigns, tracks claims across languages. Blind spots? New slang, minority languages, satire - and baked-in bias. #AI4TRUST
A1. AI has moved Europe from slow, reactive debunking to real-time scanning. It spots patterns, bot networks and cross-border narratives fast. But humans still decide what’s true and how to respond. #AI4TRUST
A5. When the next wave hits: humans verify, explain, build trust. AI scans and maps. What AI shouldn’t do? Be the final judge of truth in messy political debates. #AI4TRUST
A3. As the AI Act rolls out, worries grow: opaque tools shaping coverage, over-automation, and who’s accountable when AI gets it wrong. #AI4TRUST
A3. Start with the people: institutions, NGOs, media must earn trust. AI alone won’t fix a broken relationship. As Euractiv made clear when it joined The Trust Project to adopt 'trust indicators' in journalism - transparency from media organisations matters. #aicodeproject
#aicodeproject eurac.tv/9Ygv
A4. Huge role. AI can surface, monitor, alert - but what counts as ‘trustworthy’ still needs human editorial judgment, ethical frameworks and public debate. For example, this AI-CODE video emphasises that AI should support editorial judgment, not replace it. eurac.tv/9Ygr #aicodeproject
A2. As the EC said in the #MeettheFuture event in December: “Strengthening the European Democracy Shield will require human-in-the-loop tools that support journalists, fact-checkers, researchers; clearer platform accountability and risk mitigation”. Read more here: eurac.tv/9Yp3 #AI4TRUST
