//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts







Loading...
Even though my contribution was small, I’m happy to see this study published—and to have 493 new co-authors. As a part of the SCORE project, we reanalyzed 100 claims from 100 papers: 74% reached the same conclusion, 24% were null/inconclusive, and 2% went the other way.
2mo
⚠️YEM2026 — submissions close soon (Feb 28). Keynotes: Eugen Dimant (UPenn) & Therese Nilsson (Lund). Brno @ MUNI, 27-29 May. More details 👉 yem.econ.muni.cz
3mo
Miloš Fišar
#YEM2026 YEM: Young Economists' Meeting in Brno, Czech Republic
yem.econ.muni.cz
YEM 2026 | YEM: Young Economists' Meeting
504 reanalyses by 457 independent reanalysts, with at least 5 reanalyses per claim. The core question was simple: how much do our findings depend on analysts’ choices rather than the data alone?
6mo
2mo
Miloš Fišar