#metacheck #rstats #PsyTeachR #OpenResearch #ManyFaces #iyknyd (overwhelmed by social media) 🏳️🌈 she/they
Lisa DeBruine
Loading...
The specific modules we provide follow our values, but the metacheck infrastructure is designed for user-created additional modules. I guess all coding languages have this problem. What if someone uses python for evil? But still I wrestle with this.
We think automated tools (which in metacheck are seldom genAI based), can help by collecting information that is either tedious to check (e.g., cross-referencing retractionwatch and pubpeer), or one might not know to check (e.g., completeness of power analysis reporting).
This is my nightmare scenario for metacheck. We’re building it to support human decision making, never replace it. This is clear in our values, but how can we ensure users follow these values?
www.scienceverse.org/metacheck/#o...
The @glasgow.ac.uk 2026-9 Research Culture Action Plan has launched! The core values here are admirable; now we keep working towards truly living them.
🔍 Research Integrity & Ethics
📖 Open Research
🏆 Research Recognition
👩🏿🤝👨🏾 Collegiality and Teams
🎓 Career Development
www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/ri...
It’s good — essential even — to marginalize wrong and bad ideas.
The way we get out of this is by pointing out how stupid and evil these inbred troglodytes are, not by feeding their ass-backwards superiority complex.
