//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts





Loading...
Also I have years and years of cross referential work and claims that have influenced my work and evidence for theories I adapt and test organized across zotero, enabling a lot of diligence in credit giving, zotero is also an open source nonprofit like just a wild target Computers good actually
This is a niche complaint and I am at peace with that. But untestable frameworks where all proposed causal relationships go in all possible directions are useless.
My book is entirely programmatic citations because it maintains a database for all records and allows easy ref style switches and a master record from which all in-text refs update. Why......would this be a bad thing It takes more effort but then saves more effort. So weird to call diligence lazy
"yeah that's evidence for my theory. Oh you found the exact opposite? You're never gonna believe this but..." Ridiculous
I think it's funny software can critique everything apps but apparently not everything frameworks
Is this performance art