//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
Among other experts, the Guardian article also includes commentary from @garymarcus.bsky.social, whose recent blog - Richard Dawkins and The Claude Delusion - is well worth a read too. šŸ‘‡
Very nice talk by @garymarcus.bsky.social at the University of Edinburgh this morning
Truth, c/o @garymarcus.bsky.social
Excellent reminder from @garymarcus.bsky.social of all the arguments about why chatbots(a far better term than the misleading ā€œAIā€) are not conscious, using Dawkins’ daft infatuation as the starting point.
Thank you again @garymarcus.bsky.social, this time for putting in words the disappointment I felt after reading how easily Richard Dawkins was deluded by a language model. garymarcus.substack.com/p/richard-da...
ā€œThe fundamental problem here is that #Dawkins doesn’t reflect on how these outputs have been generated. Claude’s outputs are the product of a form of #mimicry, rather than as a report of genuine #internalstates.ā€ open.substack.com/pub/garymarc...
Crux of Musk-OpenAI trial so far is that Brockman keeps acting as if selling chatbots & API access for profit (which is what they do now) is exactly the same as the original mission (working on the AI safety problem for public benefit). They aren’t. If the jury figures that out, OpenAI loses.
What is the one thing that most worries you about AI? In a survey of 3,700 AI researchers, only 3% replied existential risk—despite the prominence given to these risks in media. Far more experts are worried aout malicious use, misinformation, job losses, bias, etc. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
ā€œthere are already signs of harm, such as AI eroding education, enabling cybercrime & feeding into ppl’s delusions. ā€˜The companies are raking in funding, & letting society pick up the pieces,’ says @garymarcus.bsky.social . Many researchers argue for focusing on these current threats and—
A deranged shooter racing through a hotel to shoot the President is a real wake-up call … on the need for g̵u̵n̵ ̵c̵o̵n̵t̵r̵o̵l̵ a gigantic ballroom. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...