//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
Can you tell which line below is longer? No? Then maybe humans cannot discriminate similar numbers with an approximate mental mechanism either. Read more about it at osf.io/6m4zw
My colleague Colin Foster has released a new resource designed for secondary mathematics teachers: “Teaching the Big Ideas in School Mathematics”. Available here: bigmathematicalideas.org
2mo
1mo
In a number comparison task, the size effect is, in fact, at least three distinct size effects with three corresponding generators. See more details about the anatomy of the number comparison size effect at doi.org/10.3758/s134...
2mo
bigmathematicalideas.org
Introduction – Teaching the Big Ideas in School Mathematics
In symbolic number comparison tasks, the numerical distance and size effects are largely influenced by the statistical properties of the stimuli. Here, we tested whether nonsymbolic number comparison ...
doi.org
Different sources of the numerical comparison size effect - Memory & Cognition
Attila Krajcsi
Attila Krajcsi
Matthew Inglis
In memory of Barbara Jaworski. blog.lboro.ac.uk/cmc/2026/04/...
2mo
New Preprint! Non-symbolic quantity estimation may be characterised by many signatures, yet we typically focus on only a few of them. Sharing first as a preprint because we are interested in feedback. If you have any thoughts or comments, please do get in touch! Enjoy :) osf.io/preprints/ps...
21d
Matthew Inglis
blog.lboro.ac.uk
Obituary for Barbara Jaworski – Centre for Mathematical Cognition
In this review with Natalia Dubinkina, we discuss how competing theoretical accounts of numerosity estimation often differ not only in the mechanisms they propose, but also in which behavioural phenomena they prioritise and attempt to explain.
We discuss what this means for evaluating competing models, what should be classified as a behavioural “signature,” and how the field may move towards greater consensus in the future.
Enjoyed reading this recent paper by @davidjpurpura.bsky.social and Jasmine Ernst. Really cool! :) www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
21d