//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Philosophy of science, methodology of social sciences, wellbeing, evidence based policy, measurement. Professor @hpscambridge.bsky.social Fellow @kingscollege.bsky.social Russian Brit She/her https://philpeople.org/profiles/anna-alexandrova
Anna Alexandrova
Loading...
I finally got round to reading properly @alondra.bsky.social's outstanding essay on implications of AI for social science: www.amacad.org/sites/defaul... - highly recommended
I hate to repeat myself but summaries of texts are summaries for a purpose. A summary of Carnap’s Aufbau is different if the summary is for (a) what it says about epistemology, (b) its account of philosophy per se, (c) its place in the history of analytic philosophy, etc. THE summary doesn’t exist.
I'll be presenting this work at PSA (San Diego, Nov 2026). The question is how to think about "formative" (aggregate) constructs and their empirical measurements in the social sciences (e.g., socio-economic status). The standard view (e.g., Borsboom 2005) requires constructs to be causes of...