Two new facts stand out:
1. 85% of hallucinated citations in preprints are also in the subsequent journal version (thanks, peer review!)
2. Fake cites more likely to use the names of (male) scholars who are already highly cited, creating a fake-citation Matthew effect.
arxiv.org/abs/2605.07723
#LANGUAGE “Non-English-speaking researchers can now produce work in their own language, but they must still engage with literature overwhelmingly written in English," says @caropradier.bsky.social, co-author of a new study directed by @lariviev.bsky.social.
nouvelles.umontreal.ca/en/article/2...
Drawing on 88 million articles across all disciplines, an UdeM study examines the global evolution of language use in academic publishing between 1990 and 2023.
-> Advancing Diamond : A Portrait 🎥
Last April, “Advancing Diamond” brought together nearly 80 experts in scholarly publishing for two days of friendly and productive discussions.
📌 shorturl.at/oac74