this is the point I've been trying to make about the combination of first amendment formalism and docket control.
There's no colorable argument that boycotts and spending aren't two sides of the same coin. The court has just chosen to say that explicitly with spending and hasn't with boycotts.
Still flummoxed that Republicans say corporate election expenditures and contributions are the purest and highest form of First Amendment speech, but corporations have no constitutional right at all to participate in boycotts or disassociate with objectionable clients. www.wsj.com/finance/regu...
Luke Smith Morgan
www.wsj.com
The U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C. subpoenaed JPMorgan, Bank of America and others as part of a probe into alleged debanking.
