BREAKING: Judge denies patients of Stanford's children's hospital a TRO against the hospital in the patients' lawsuit seeking to stop Stanford from turning over invasive information about gender-affirming care to DOJ via NDTexas grand jury, finding they did not show the hospital is a state actor.
Chris Geidner
This sort of grotesque, juvenile and disrespectful (and ignorant--the Germans weren't the ones storming the beaches!) analogy is precisely in character with what *everyone* knew Hegseth to be. Keep the focus here where it belongs--on the 50 Senators who knowingly approved the horror.
Very helpful recap of the gender-affirming-care subpoena cases. Like Stanford, I fear that the suits against Stanford and NYU might "result in the worst-case scenario for the plaintiffs." Today's hearing in San Jose might offer more clarity.
www.cnn.com/2026/06/05/p...
Parents said in court papers they’re worried that having records disclosed could expose them to retaliation by the Trump administration.
This Stanford hearing is ROUGH.
Judge Pitts asked why DOJ wasn't sued, why not in ND Texas, what would happen w conflicting orders. The lawyer for the patients—Caleb Hayes-Deats from Abbe Lowell's new firm—did not do a great job of answering things.
Background: www.lawdork.com/p/dojs-invas...
Hegseth at Normandy:
"Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies. Beaches in Spain and Italy and Greece and Bulgaria. Boats and men arrive. When will European capitals do something about that invasion? Or is it too late? I pray not, and I believe not."
