My latest for @jotwell.bsky.social is a review of @lewisgrahamlaw.bsky.social's forthcoming article on the use of s 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 by UK courts. conlaw.jotwell.com/doctrine-by-...
Lewis Graham, Interpreting the Interpretive Obligation: Empirical Insights into the Use of Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998, __ Oxford J. Legal Stud. __ (Mar. 14, 2026).Leonid SirotaIt is not di...
So this is happening! Many thanks to the reviewers, and to those who have read my proposal and sample chapter draft, and heard me present ideas that will be going into this over the years. I'm looking forward to sharing more as the manuscript takes shape.
So this is happening! Many thanks to the reviewers, and to those who have read my proposal and sample chapter draft, and heard me present ideas that will be going into this over the years. I'm looking forward to sharing more as the manuscript takes shape.
The closest parallel, which I have sketched out in my post on Taylor, is what's happening with the (non-)application of Doré. That's just as bad as the interpretation stuff, and just as much a failure of this court to act like, well, a court.
ICYMI: Those of us who oppose populist shortcuts in response to judicial incompetence or wilfulness do not owe the populists "options". doubleaspect.blog/2026/05/08/y...
