//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
(Palaeo)[ecologist | limnologist] & #fakeStatistican, #rstats user, wielder of #GAMs. He/him/his. Opinions mine…
Gavin Simpson
Loading...
🆘 Help! 🆘 How should we treat subjects lost to follow-up in an agricultural trial & does it change if H0 being tested is some form of "assuming the subject makes it to time period x, there is no diff between treatment & control groups"? stats.stackexchange.com/q/676127/1390 #statistics #RStats
11d
I've been mulling this on and off for a little while. Colleagues ran a trial in production animals; they recruited a number of farms and a number of the animals in these farms herds were randomised...
stats.stackexchange.com
Interpretation of subjects lost to follow-up in a trial as missing data?
Gavin Simpson
AI is a tool that *can* create value when used correctly for the right problem, it is NOT a value in and of itself.