//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
Imagine being the man in this photo and sacrificing your marriage to Poast moar about trans people
15h
It is not, thinking does not happen in a vacuum, it is always about something, or in collaboration with something or against something minds are not and cannot be ideal spheres performing ideal logical operations without any point of reference i feel like i am losing my fucking mind
Except tobacco has uh, a definition
My entire LinkedIn feed is about AI in education, and the main 'argument' from the pro-AI side is more of a demand, and the demand is that educators change their standard to stop asking students to know things.
Claude Limerick
Which presents an interesting pedagogical claim: that there is a skill called critical thinking that can be entirely divorced from content knowledge. And this might be unpopular to say, but I'm not sure that's true. You actually need to know a few things in order to think critically about new info