//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies
Loading...
Now out in @tandfresearch.bsky.social International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction: "Expertise Elevates AI Usage: Experimental Evidence Comparing Laypeople and Professional Artists" www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.... 50 pro artists vs randos vs AI agent used image generators to do art:
Sure, a result needs to be expressed sufficiently well to be understood, that's the minimum. But is *beautiful* (I should've emphasized that) writing more important than the result and the process of getting there - prob not right? So does it matter if the text describing the result is AI-generated?