Thinking about why women might not want to use a product that has forced itself into every software interface to confidently shout things that are wrong
UC Berkeley Law creates new AI policy that bans AI for "conceptualizing, outlining, drafting, revising, translating, or editing any work submitted for credit" or exams because "thinking remains the sine qua non of good lawyering (and of a quality legal education)."
That's what I'm talking about.
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Pavel
#marsdenshmarsden I guess 🪦
“Justice minister Paul Goldsmith is ploughing ahead with the most damaging legislative attack on Māori seen in a generation, based on nothing much more than his own “view”, says Treaty expert Carwyn Jones.” #nzpol
#RacismInAction
New Zealand's flagship discovery research fund is running its final round before being absorbed into a government-directed system. The 29% funding cut lands on a country that already spends half the O...
“It’s the most damaging collection of legislative Treaty proposals I’ve seen in my career, breaching Te Tiriti on a scale and breadth that we haven’t yet witnessed in our lifetimes.” — Carwyn Jones.
One of the more misogynistic takes currently trending in the AI policy space is "women use less AI than men because they have less tech literacy" Ok but have you considered that women use less AI than men because we have more tech literacy?
Nicola Gaston
“Students don’t oppose AI from ignorance but EXPERIENCE. This was quite shocking to me: Gallup found that Gen Z high usage has not decreased despite anger having increased. They know what they’re protesting against BECAUSE they know what AI is doing to them.”
