Most journals (including Nature and Science) require declaring AI use. How come there is no mention of AI, LLMs, "agents" or "Microsoft Discovery" anywhere in the paper while the official press release talks more about agentic AI contributions than majorana qubits?
news.microsoft.com/source/featu...
Strangely, the accompanying paper has zero mentions of AI or "agents".
arxiv.org/abs/2606.03884
For those who missed it, here's a quick summary of Microsoft Majorana 2 announcement: "Agentic AI, AI agent teams, AI agent, agentic AI, agentic AI, AI agents, AI-driven, agent, agentic AI, agentic AI, agentic AI, agents, agentic AI, AI, agentic AI, agentic AI..."
news.microsoft.com/source/featu...
👇
I think becoming a Dulwich Quantum Meme is a good way to cap off the PhD
Wait a second, Michio Kaku claims his publisher runs his books by a fact checker! Who was it?? Give me their name!!! I want to talk to that person!!!!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU1f...
p.s. It would be so great if this claim itself did not fact check...
Hey @psiquantum.bsky.social, how does your timeline for going from zero qubits to solving climate change compares to Microsoft's?
Feel like they've almost gone out of their way to fill this video entirely with classical phenomena. Quantum fish anyone?
Google: "Quantum is the language of nature"
Me: Which volume of Weinberg's "Quantum Theory of Fields" should I read if I want to be able to talk to my plants?
Quantum industry: We can solve climate change!
Also quantum industry: But first we need to get some helium-3 from the moon!
"The next quantum revolution may require a helium ‘gold rush’ on the moon"
archive.ph/0P5ML