I worry that initiatives like this will break pro-social norms. Willingness to give feedback generously is one of the most beautiful things in our community. Plus, universities pay profs with the understanding that this is part of the job description, so the idea we do this for "free" is laughable.
Vincent Arel-Bundock
Paying peer reviewers works.
Expanded Fast & Fair experiment @biologyopen.bsky.social:
• 5.5 vs 37.7 working days to decision with reviews
• ~3 vs ~9 reviewer invitations per manuscript
• no reduction in editor-assessed review quality
• similar acceptance rates
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
