Prof. Most tweets about R. “Polisci, it’s all about what’s going on.”
http://arelbundock.com
Vincent Arel-Bundock
Loading...
I worry that initiatives like this will break pro-social norms. Willingness to give feedback generously is one of the most beautiful things in our community. Plus, universities pay profs with the understanding that this is part of the job description, so the idea we do this for "free" is laughable.
WARNING: This is very early alpha experiment. I would LOVE it if you could tell me what works and what doesn't. Also, if you know how I could make permissions tighter, while maintaining functionality, I'd be very interested! 2/2
Incentives to reproduce and replicate articles are so bad. Even when your comment leads to the retraction of a PLOS One article, the reward is a (10 days late) email with a thank you at the bottom.
Retraction notice: journals.plos.org/plosone/arti....
But we are not complaining about PLOS One 🧵
Vincent Arel-Bundock
Paying peer reviewers works.
Expanded Fast & Fair experiment @biologyopen.bsky.social:
• 5.5 vs 37.7 working days to decision with reviews
• ~3 vs ~9 reviewer invitations per manuscript
• no reduction in editor-assessed review quality
• similar acceptance rates
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
