//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
Using fully autonomous AI in an inherently human activity like science and then advocating for humans in the loop puts humans in a secondary role and frames us as an add-on rather than the core. This flawed framing is against the human spirit of science."
Rather than positioning humans to verify what autonomous AI produces, it is more valuable to develop AI systems that verify and strengthen human-generated science. Instead of humans in the loop, we need AI in the loop where necessary and reliable to support and augments human judgment.