//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
Americans see local consent for U.S. military intervention as not only a “practical concern” but also as a “matter of moral principle,” writes @janinadill.bsky.social.
Moreover, Americans care about what the local population actually wants. I draw on joint experimental work with Livia Schubiger & Emily Myers, in @intsecurity.bsky.social, which shows that local consent increases public support for military intervention in the United States.
direct.mit.edu/isec/article...
The research article in International Security is now open access here:
Claiming local consent without evidence it not only morally wrong; it is also bad politics. The piece in @foreignaffairs.com is here: www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...