//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts
Loading...
For my philological issues with Christian Wildberg's (and thus M. David Litwa's) approach to the Corpus Hermeticum as being uncommonly saturated with marginalia to the point of being too corrupt to read but that we can confidently identify such marginalia and produce a new "core primary text":
18h
polyphanes, spooky mystic fruit 𐠎
So, to start with, Wildberg's idea is laid out in his "Genesis of a Genesis" paper, which is good to familiarize ourselves with. His forthcoming work has been ten years in the making (fair enough), but it's still not done yet, leaving a lot of questions unanswered. www.academia.edu/3382571/Corp...
18h
Corpus Hermeticum Tractate III: The Genesis of a Genesis
Corpus Hermeticum Tractate III: The Genesis of a Genesis
www.academia.edu
polyphanes, spooky mystic fruit 𐠎