You can access my dissertation here: doi.org/10.33540/3471
Humans move their eyes 3-4 times per second to select visual information. Therefore, the decision of what to select is one of the most frequent decisions the brain is faced with. What determines what ...
I became a dr. last week! Thanks to everyone who made it an amazing day - I had a blast.
We often fail to pay attention to what's important for extended periods of time. What's going on in the brain when we're failing to pay attention?
In a new preprint, we show that frontal potentials (fP3) track visual and auditory attentional lapses.
doi.org/10.64898/202...
#neuroscience
Reward and intrinsic effort-costs drive saccade selection 👀. But what happens when these factors compete?
Our newest preprint shows that saccade selection follows principles of economic decision-making:
Investigations into whether we can search for multiple targets in a simultaneous fashion have led to mixed findings.
In this new PsychScience article, we report that people CAN search concurrently, but don't always DO so... 🧵
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
New paper out: Trial-level sequence modeling reveals hidden dynamics of dual-task interference.
We decoded, at the trial level, the sequence of cognitive operations people take when multitasking. We found that how cognitive operations interleaved across tasks predicted RT and accuracy!
www.biorxiv.org
Damian Koevoet
Damian Koevoet
Damian Koevoet
New preprint (doi.org/10.64898/202...) shows that where you look next is an economic decision.
Saccades trade off effort-costs (measured via pupil) against monetary rewards.
1) By default, participants have strong saccade direction preferences (e.g., cardinal over diagonal, up over down)
(1/4)
Damian Koevoet
Author summary In our daily lives, we are often required to juggle multiple tasks at once, for example when operating an in-car device while driving. While multitasking is increasingly common, researc...
New preprint (doi.org/10.64898/202...) shows that where you look next is an economic decision.
Saccades trade off effort-costs (measured via pupil) against monetary rewards.
1) By default, participants have strong saccade direction preferences (e.g., cardinal over diagonal, up over down)
(1/4)
