I don't think they're actually evil but a poster saying "give it ambiguous problems, skip the guard-rails, walk away :)" reads like a background gag in some goofy post-apocalypse
did an an evil AI write this
"the new toaster says 'I Love You' when you put the toast in, and 'I'm Sorry' when it burns it. This causes some people to get angry b/c they don't think the toaster means it, and others to develop unhealthy attachments b/c they think it does.
the solution is to make the toaster TRULY sorry"
this is a silly recap of long and serious conversations that went in many directions, and no one there would sign up to that exact view; but I'm still kinda worried about that (among other things)
אני לאורלי, כשנגמר היוגורט האיסלנדי שאני אוהב:
I just came back from a Dagstuhl Seminar on "social intelligence in AI". There's much to consider, but I worry a current path we're on is:
starting another review and praying to Saint Lavigne (the Patron of Reviewers) for a good manuscript
Coda: I posted this in a cafe, and felt a shoulder tap.
I turned to the beaming face of a kindly older woman
"Sorry," she smiled, "I just had to talk to someone looking at a picture of The Blessed Mother"
We spent 15m chatting pleasantly abt Franciscans; I take this all as a punishment from God