ALRIGHT EVERYONE HERE IS THE OFFICIAL SUFS GUIDE TO LEAVING PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE OMB-2026-0034 PROPOSED RULE: www.standupforscience.foundation/policy-and-advocacy/the-sufs-guide-to-writing-public-comments
(share with all your friends!)
Our newest finding: tiny microsaccades are biased toward the location that is about to be attentionally suppressed.
This suggests that attention briefly precedes suppression: before the system can suppress a location, it first appears to select it.
Only 4 days until our free webinar on writing better, fairer reviews! You'll leave with a practical framework for giving feedback that's specific, balanced, and fair. Register using the link below.
Many consequences to this.
Suppose you are an NIH program officer, hoping for a promotion to a branch chief or division chief position.
Now, if you get the promotion, you may well lose your civil service protections.
This could be very destructive to NIH and to individual careers.
🚨Paper alert!🚨 Across 5 expts, @mileritayar.bsky.social's new JEPG paper shows that people explicitly avoid switching between attention control states. Using demand selection tasks, we find that people don't just avoid cognitive conflict, but also switching between congruent and incongruent trials.
Another handful of sand in the gears:
Researchers cannot serve on a panel *at all* if anyone from their institution has submitted to that panel. Recusing themselves for the proposal itself is no longer sufficient.
This is needless, but will certainly slow things up even further.
Written by: Cole Donovan, Director of Policy and Advocacy and Colette Delawalla, PhD, CEO