I am reading the report that other reviewers made for a manuscript I also reviewed. One reviewer (R2, actually) simply says the paper has been AI-generated, therefore he/she is not reviewing it. There is no explanation where this impression comes from. This is not a helpful report.
This looks absolutely incredible.
@lars.vilhuber.com I think you're going to love this
This paper finds that economists whose job market papers report (marginally) statistically significant results are more likely to secure academic jobs. Hiring committees prefer statistical significance; this creates incentives for researchers to p-hack.