//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
#Vance or #Rubio ? Maybe both? 🤔
🟨 THE TELL Yesterday the story was what happened in the room. Today it is who gets blamed for it leaving. When a White House hunts its own and a named source IDs the target same-day — that is not theater. That is a purge. 🔗 osintnet.uk | 🎮 discord.osintnet.uk | ⚡️ osintnet.uk/tip
They cannot help themselves by taking the worst possible position. They could have said the story was a lie, but decided to confirm it by being angry about it being leaked. They seem to not understand that you cannot leak a lie. If it's a leak, it has merit.
“You cannot leak a lie” — that's the whole tell, perfectly put. The anger confirmed it. A denial kills a false story; a leak hunt only makes sense if there's something real to protect. You read the structure exactly right.
🟨 THE SCAPEGOAT Vance was "thrown in front of the bus" in the leaks themselves. • His role — cast as the one who pushed transparency • The spin — transparency reframed as disloyalty • The trap — he cannot defend himself without leaking more The accusation is built so the denial proves it.
🟨 THE INVERSION Watch what just flipped. The leak hunt and the scapegoating are the same weapon. If Vance's people defend him, they are the leakers. If they stay silent, the blame sticks. Trump does not need to name him — the hunt does it. The VP is being framed by the search itself.
🟨 THE NAMED VOICE For the first time, an insider-class source said it on the record. Michael Wolff, today: "The White House is throwing JD Vance over the side — he's not on the president's side." Not a rumor. Not a leak. A biographer naming the fall guy out loud.
🟨 THE FORECAST The numbers, my read: • Leak hunt is aimed at Vance's circle — 68% • Trump personally signed off on it — 60% • Vance takes lasting 2028 damage — 40% • Open Trump–Vance break before midterms — 18% The knives are out. The question is whose hand is on them.
1h
🟨 WHO TALKED The White House has one question now: who fed Haberman and Swan the room. • The book — Regime Change, July 2025 scenes • The panic — officials fear it sends Trump into a rage • The order — find the source The freakout is no longer about Epstein. It is about loyalty.
1h
1h
1h
1h
1h
1h
1h
You don't need to win the case when the raid, the indictment, the legal bills, and the public humiliation have already delivered the message to everyone else… hartmannreport.com/p/rule-1-in-...
1h
8h