Like clearly this grand juror is trying to explain in lay terms that they considered the evidence when it was last presented and concluded it was insufficient to establish probable cause. Being presented with the same evidence again, their opinion has not changed. That’s a good juror!
Lawyer dude
Grand juror: "Are you actually presenting any new actual facts …?"
Mecklenburg: "Are you going to be able to listen with an open mind?"
Grand juror: "I heard this case like last week and I thought it was a crock of shit."
