100%?
If even 5% are, he’s already beyond the pale. That’s how serious his “liabilities” are.
This isn’t about the calculus of “at what point does he become socially unacceptable.” This is about “someone who demonstrates a pattern of abusing power and privilege should not get more of both.”
שלמה לוי
Deontological moralism is not going to lead the country by example into a better chapter. Substantial Senate majorities might have a chance.
And all this assumes Platner's alleged liabilities are 100% real, which deserves some pushback.
Let's imagine someone is a genuine nazi in the mid 2020s...
