To rule out the relationship between cytoarchitecture and function, one needs to be sure they are trying to map correct functions. What makes people confident about it?
Could it be that the cerebellum is a perfect area to study the duality of prediction and control?
Sanders' proposal for the government to take a 50% stake in AI companies is, IMO, a good idea.
AI will be a critical piece of infrastructure, one which should be built with appropriate safe-guards and environmental planning.
Trying to cancel AI is foolish - but leaving it to market forces is too.
This summer my lab's journal club somewhat unintentionally ended up reading papers on a theme of "more naturalistic computational neuroscience". I figured I'd share the list of papers here ๐งต:
On a deeper level: the purpose of arealization is (or should be) be to help understand function; so function has no place on the list of area criteria.
If the other criteria disagree with function, that just makes them a poor guide to arealization.