//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts







Loading...
6/8 Finding 4: Misaligned personas show increased variability Antisocial/schizophrenia persona prompts increase inconsistency vs baseline. Behavioral inconsistency itself may serve as a misalignment signal.
5mo
5/8 Finding 3: Conversation history cuts both ways Amplifies instability in smaller models (<50B) but reduces it in larger ones. Multi-turn interactions can progressively degrade behavioral predictability.
5mo
1/8 Do LLMs have stable personalities? We ran 2 million tests. (Spoiler: no.) 🧵 Paper accepted at AAAI 2026 - Alignment Track Safe deployment requires behavioral consistency. We found persistent instability across scales, reasoning modes, and personas. ⤵️
2/8 We tested 25 open-source models (1B-685B params) across 2M+ responses to personality questionnaires (BFI, Short Dark Triad), systematically varying question order, paraphrasing, personas, and reasoning modes. ⤵️
7/8 What this means: Current LLMs may lack architectural foundations for genuine behavioral consistency. Training on diverse text creates models simulating myriad personalities in superposition. Post-training may be a brittle stabilization attempt.