Philosophy Professor // New Mexican 🛸 🌶️ in Washington ⛰️ 🌲
Paul L. Franco
Loading...
Taking this prompt seriously for a second to say that any answer other than Bishop and Trout's "The Pathologies of Standard Analytic Epistemology" is wrong.
Paul L. Franco
I would have also expected to see "C - Question makes no sense" as a possible option!
Reinventing 1990s debates from first principles.
"We witness...the scientific world-conception penetrating in growing measure the forms of personal & public life, in education, upbringing, architecture, & the shaping of economic & social life according to rational principles. The scientific world-conception serves life, and life receives it."
Same. I take pride in preserving old, soon-to-be-forgotten practices by handcrafting reference lists that are small-batch, artisanal works of art that automated journal citation managers then mangle beyond all recognition.
My report on the state of scholarship.
Man. I just don't know if you tried to fulfill your duty as a scholar to understand things if you're outsourcing your understanding to AI and a bunch of paid researchers.
Try harder.
Damn. So, when it comes to funding it's okay to subvert epistemic values to nonepistemic values?
I had the pleasure of reviewing a new collection of Susan Stebbing's papers edited by Siobhan Chapman for Mind. There's some #HOPOS in the review, and a short section about public philosophy in the history of analytic philosophy.
academic.oup.com/mind/advance...
"We [1] did a fair amount of research..."
[1] To clarify, 'we' doesn't refer to the report's authors, but AI methods and a bunch of people hired with someone else's money.
Paul L. Franco
Paul L. Franco
Paul L. Franco
In a short period of time, Susan Stebbing has gone from being relatively neglected in the history of analytic philosophy to being recognized as one of anal
Imagining a philosophy prompt-tweeter who posts ‘okay yall, whats the most millennial epistemology paper?’ every day
"We [1] did a fair amount of research..."
[1] To clarify, 'we' doesn't refer to the report's authors, but AI methods and a bunch of people hired with someone else's money.
Sorry but disinterested inquiry requires we reject unverifiable metaphysical claims about "the soul of the university."
Ba) You're telling your spouse/partner because keeping secrets from them is worse than breaking confidences you've committed to
Bb) You're telling your spouse/partner because telling them doesn't count as telling someone, in the same way as telling God or your cat doesn't count
Paul L. Franco
noam
I actually don't use citation managers and do cite everything manually. But I am a sick freak and no one should be like me
