//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
The takeaway: caregiving experience seems to help people lean into nurturance and hormones follow. T isn't just up or down with caregiving; it depends on whether the moment feels nurturant vs. overwhelming. šŸ’—
The simulator is programmed to cry, need feeding, diapering, burping, and soothing. Couples did a 10-min caregiving task in the lab Friday, took the baby for the weekend, then came back Monday for a second task. We measured testosterone (via saliva) before & after each task. šŸ‘¶
Past work suggests testosterone drops in nurturant contexts and rises in challenging ones — but findings with dyadic caregiving have been mixed. šŸ“‰šŸ§‘ā€šŸ¤ā€šŸ§‘
psych post-bacc jobs are scattered across wikis, twitter/bsky, and random lab sites. hard to find if you're not already in the field. I started a slack to pool them in one place — a low-effort bulletin board, channels by subfield, updated live! šŸ”—ā¬‡ļø
Finding 1: Both men and women showed significant T declines after the second caregiving session — but not the first.
We gave 30 couples without kids an infant simulator for the weekend and tracked how they handled it. Nope, this isn't a reality show: it's a scientific paper! šŸ¼ New in Human Nature šŸ‘‡šŸ”—
if you're looking for a position: join and browse. if you're in the field (grad students, PIs, lab managers): join and drop links as you see them. takes 2 seconds, can mute notifs, or just forward to me and I can share!