//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts







Loading...
At the same time, visual regions represent the predicted content – the orientation that would have appeared if the sequence had continued – in a temporally-precise way. Instead of overall visual activity entraining, specifically activity encoding predicted content rises and falls with the rhythm.
Following the stimulus-empty window, participants saw a probe which, varying by block, they had to judge in terms of its orientation or timing. When judging time, but not orientation, motor oscillations phase-couple (or ‘entrain’) to the tracked – but absent – rhythm, predicting task performance.
Content and time are inherently linked in our perceptual experience, so much so that we use changes in content – like hands on a clock – to tell time. Here, we ask how the brain conjointly keeps track of content and time.