//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
Without regional cooperation, the United Arab Emirates “faces a future not of strategic autonomy as it craves but of dependence on political decisions made in the United States and Israel,” writes @andrewleber.bsky.social.
“The American president who comes after Trump should set out to update, improve, and sell the idea of an enlightened and U.S.-led world where leadership, rules, values, institutions, and norms still matter,” writes Philip Gordon.
“Thanks to U.S. sanctions and Havana’s internal mismanagement,” Cuba is “facing economic disaster,” writes Ricardo Zuniga. How can the island escape this crisis?
“When Beijing casts structural problems as technical hurdles or pressures from abroad, it limits the reforms it is willing to pursue while offloading responsibility,” writes Francesca Ghiretti.
Restoring transatlantic trust will require “a long-term change in the tone and behavior of U.S. leaders over multiple electoral cycles,” argues David Gioe. “It will not simply reappear after Trump leaves office.”
Washington still fields “the world’s most capable force of aircraft, warships, and submarines,” writes Isaac Kardon. But “the efficacy of U.S. military power in contested littoral zones” is eroding.
Americans see local consent for U.S. military intervention as not only a “practical concern” but also as a “matter of moral principle,” writes @janinadill.bsky.social.
On the latest episode of “The Foreign Affairs Interview,” Philip Gordon and Mara Karlin discuss how U.S. allies have reacted to Trump’s cajoling and threats over the course of his second term—and how those responses will shape the future of U.S. power. https://fam.ag/4vxHKjR
Overseas bases make the United States more likely “to default to military action,” writes @profrachelmetz.bsky.social. “If war were harder to wage, perhaps Washington would wage fewer unwise wars.”
“The U.S. military needs to work more closely with its allies to meet the challenges they share with Washington,” argues Thomas Mahnken. “Otherwise, the United States risks stretching itself too thin in an increasingly dangerous world.”
18h
1d
5d
4d
4d
15h
1d
5d
4d
5d
America depends on global order—and can restore it.
www.foreignaffairs.com
What American military force can and cannot do.
www.foreignaffairs.com
Don’t Give Up on Global Order
The Day After in Cuba
Iran and the Hidden Cost of Wartime Access
Overseas bases make the U.S. military dominant—and more likely to blunder into war.
www.foreignaffairs.com
The Pentagon needs both quantity and quality to win modern conflicts.
www.foreignaffairs.com
Beijing’s blind spots hinder real reform.
www.foreignaffairs.com
The American Military’s Coming Marathon
How China Misperceives Itself
The crisis between Washington and Europe may be a blessing in disguise.
www.foreignaffairs.com
A risky quest for strategic autonomy in a war-torn Middle East.
www.foreignaffairs.com
The Transatlantic Crucible
Can the UAE Go It Alone?
How America Lost Command of the Commons
The oceans may soon be tolled.
www.foreignaffairs.com
How Americans think about U.S. military interventions.
www.foreignaffairs.com
Greeted as Liberators?
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs