//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Genetics, genomics, and evolution research scientist (then: humans, now: nematodes), reproductive freedom advocate, mom, scientific inclusion promoter, Atlantan. She/her. Views my own.
Avery Davis Bell









Loading...
How can you look honestly at your field and not recognize the contributions that come from all sorts of people, institutions, job categories, lab sizes and types, etc etc.
Obviously it is difficult for me to have a civil conversation with people who pretend not to see that the vast diversity in how we do NIH funded science, including job type/category, is the reason it is so productive.
More than this. The research enterprise is inherently uncertain. Sometimes you will fail. Having your entire livelihood depend on not failing creates a moral hazard. This is a skeet about stability being essential to innovation.