Building a museum of science and skepticism in Washington DC. BSmuseum.org
Opinions are my own.
Loading...
"In a review of key claims by the documentary, ABC News found that the majority of the scientific observations made in 'An Inconvenient Truth' have come to fruition or are on track to in the years to come."
Find out what you can do!
The games are "backed by Donald Trump Jr.'s venture capital firm, 1789 Capitol, and tech billionaire Peter Thiel."
"Enhanced Group, is using the games as a launch pad for their business, selling peptides and other supplements."
"NSF issued a statement saying that it 'appreciates the concerns raised by the range of stakeholders' and would halt efforts to remove or disable equipment... it will redeploy equipment that already was removed from the water and convene an expert panel to determine the future of the network."
I'm not sure how to interpret this. The article doesn't say that the recent big-news AI proofs are wrong.
The fact that an AI could be wrong doesn't seem worthy of a "declaration."
Thoughts?
"What is Blake Whiting?" is more like it. Popular science books rewritten by AI.
“And as soon as it got into the supplement space,” he continued, “the need for data kind of went out the window, and it all became a marketing exercise.”
However, the theory took off and “outpaced the actual data,” Dr. Kaeberlein said. “You get high-profile people writing review articles, talking at conferences, nowadays going on podcasts stating what I would say are early stage models as if they are proven fact.”
