//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
@jeankaddour.bsky.social Nice work! You mention in the paper that TPO is orthogonal to approaches such as MaxRL. Have you tried both together by chance?
Je peut aussi recommander @openstreetmap.bsky.social pour ça. Au moins en Allemagne mais ça devrait marcher partout.
I agree with your points. But I would have assumed that the inherent noise in our data would easily allow one to show that not even coarse alignment holds. The different abstraction-levels of image and text in sth like WIT could help (less degrees of freedom) or completely destroy alignment (noise).
1mo
1mo
1mo
Unfortunately, Claude did not, in fact, learn a lesson.
To me it is positively surprising that the coarse alignment is still there. I wonder how much stronger image descriptions could improve this.
Congrats! Any information on how the model was trained? Distilled?