Two thirds of users report this.
Does he actually care about keeping bills down, or is it a posture?
www.thetimes.com/business/ene...
- growing ever greater amounts of crops to feed to ever greater numbers of animals in factory farms - to achieve ever greater diminishing returns, nutritionally - as well as degradation of nature.
Nuclear power is the most expensive way to make electricity - the slowest, most expensive and dangerous option we have. Always over budget and out of time - can’t say I’m unhappy to see the EA enforce nature protection rather than step aside for this man made disaster.
Good news. But what a crazy world we live in, we’ve been paying farmers for decades to trash wildlife and the countryside, in the name of industrial food production.
Odd intervention, Boss of French owned energy company says Britain has twice as much power generation as it needs….and we need to stop building (wind and solar) and focus on consuming more....
www.telegraph.co.uk/business/202...
We never needed a study in order to know that underground cables cost far more than overhead..:) It’s always been that way. 600 miles of new pylons sounds very little to me, we already have nearly 5,000 miles of these.
We don’t need nuclear energy to achieve energy independence and 100% green on the grid. A delay to Hinkley matters very little in my view - the chances of it ever landing in 2030 were always slim.
www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
Slightly hypocritical of Gregg Jackson (Octopus Boss) to suggest we build less pylons to help keep energy bills down - while his company stands to gain £500 Million from the gov £3 Billion heat pump fund - that's a tax burden we could do without, and heat pumps put bills up not down btw.
Errrrr,r this is the same bloke and company that right now are building two new nuclear power stations, one about five years away the other fifteen years away (Hinkley and Sizewell C).
Has he just admitted Britain does not need these?
A recent report from Compassion in World Farming makes this clear - if we stopped feeding the cereals we grow to animals and fed humans instead - we could feed 16 million more people using the same amount of land. We need to change what we chew. This new support is a welcome step.
buff.ly/D6eQ94e
