and Zhicheng's extensive response to the reviews is here metaror.org/article/rest... , with the revised version now undergoing a second round of review.
🔖 Now up on MetaROR: a full evaluation of the Handbook for Reproduction and Replication Studies, which enables researchers to conduct high-quality reproductions & replications across social science disciplines.
Reviewers praised it as timely & useful while providing recommendations.
Read it now 👇
📝 Do preregistration & registered reports restrict exploratory research? This research plan aims to find out.
The two reviewers agree the question is important but think the proposal as-is doesn't support its claims yet.
👇 Read the full research plan, editorial assessment & reviews now on MetaROR
This article proposes restructuring scientific papers, with front-loaded narratives for humans as well as machine-readable appendices.
Reviewers found the idea worthwhile & timely, while suggesting engagement with previous work & needing an update on the AI processing.
👇 Full assessment on MetaROR
A second version of this article has now been evaluated - one of the reviewers of the original deems it "very good" and feels comments were adequately addressed.
🙏 Thanks again for everyone involved in making this happen!
📝 Read both evaluations now on MetaROR: metaror.org/article/the-...
This was a massive undertaking and we are very grateful to our reviewers (Hannah Fraser, @viacovella.bsky.social, @wolfvanpaemel.bsky.social), editors (@stephenpinfield.bsky.social, Kathryn Zeiler) and of course the authors... (next comment)
