hadn't seen this on my timeline yet, but it looks interesting from an initial skim
Six years ago I published a book that engaged machine learning in terms of the politics of text, language & the impossibility of definitive authorship. Are any of the men writing now on LLMs, authorship, and text citing my 2020 work?…. No, reader, they are not.
Yup, solidarity and sorry: olivia.science/cryptogyny
Great book and FWIW I do cite you here:
Guest, O., Nuñez Hernández, N. A., & Blokpoel, M. (2026). Understanding Artificial Neural Networks: Mysterianism about Known Mechanism is Mysticism. Zenodo. doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
In case people are curious this proof indicates that AI has strictly worse prognosis for cybersecurity than deterministic programming.
I don’t have strong views on the u16 social media ban but if these platforms are so harmful, why does the govt still use them for comms?
Likewise, while kids (and everyone else!) should be encouraged to socialise in-person, they now have far fewer options following brutal cuts to youth services
Why not "gode"? "Gode code" sounds perfect, no?
LLM is acronym for Large Long Manhood, always has been.
The real question is how much water does this chud chug when doing inferences in his head?
Say “AI guardrails” again, I dare you, I double dare you!
Louise Amoore
ali alkhatib
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ
If capital is rewriting the rules of work with AI, then workers must rewrite the terms of resistance.
"A new proof shows that a fixed set of guardrails placed on AI is not universally robust against adaptive adversarial prompts"
www.nist.gov/news-events/...
"A new proof shows that a fixed set of guardrails placed on AI is not universally robust against adaptive adversarial prompts"
www.nist.gov/news-events/...
The power of big Black cock
John Madden
Adolfo Neto
Adolfo Neto
Anthropic: we can't call it God, it's too obvious, what rhymes with God
