//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
This isn’t even about AI - this is just straight-up misogyny.
16d
Reviewers in two groups were given identical resumes for Emily Clarke and James Clarke and told they had used AI. Emily's was 2x as likely to raise doubts about competence. "She can't even write a CV herself." But James "just needed a bit of help." fortune.com/2026/05/10/i...
Dr. Stephanie
16d
Amy Diehl, Ph.D.
fortune.com
“If people believe they will be judged more harshly for using AI, they are less likely to adopt it—regardless of their capability."
AI generated identical resumes for a man and a woman: Hers was more likely to be labeled 'weak,' while his got a 97% approval rating | Fortune