//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
From 2016 to 2020, almost one-third of papers by authors in China had multiple corresponding authors — but policy reforms are expected to have dampened the trend. go.nature.com/3PHuY33
The physical-sciences repository arXiv is banning researchers from posting their manuscripts on the platform for one year if a submission is found to contain references that have been hallucinated by artificial-intelligence tools. go.nature.com/4nDfXvv
As Elsevier sues Meta over AI, other scholarly publishers are keeping a watchful eye Some publishers have instead pursued licensing deals with AI companies for training large language models: cen.acs.org/policy/publi... #chemsky 🧪
Brokers of scientific fraud are constantly innovating and expanding. Companies looking to spot and tackle their activities are doing the same. cen.acs.org/policy/publi... #chemsky 🧪
6d
21d
25d
25d
An analysis of citation patterns of more than 12.5 million scientists who published 3 or more scholarly works between 1960 and 2020 reveals that scientists are less likely to produce disruptive research as they get older. My latest for @chemistryworld.com: www.chemistryworld.com/news/scienti...
#arXiv is banning researchers for one year whose manuscripts contain hallucinated references. My latest for @nature.com: www.nature.com/articles/d41... @briannosek.bsky.social, @tdietterich.bsky.social, @richardsever.bsky.social, @dermotlynott.bsky.social, @philipncohen.com, #WCRI2026
#arXiv is banning researchers for one year whose manuscripts contain hallucinated references. My latest for @nature.com: www.nature.com/articles/d41... @briannosek.bsky.social, @tdietterich.bsky.social, @richardsever.bsky.social, @dermotlynott.bsky.social, @philipncohen.com, #WCRI2026
Brokers of scientific fraud are constantly innovating and expanding. Companies looking to spot and tackle their activities are doing the same. My latest feature for @cenmag.bsky.social: cen.acs.org/policy/publi... @clearskiesadam.bsky.social, @stmassoc.bsky.social, @gcabanac.cpesr.fr #WCRI2026
Older scientists are less likely to be performing disruptive research as they’re likely already building on the disruptive work they did in their youth. @dalmeet.bsky.social reports: www.chemistryworld.com/news/scienti...
Between 2016 and 2020, researchers based in China were up to nine times more likely to list multiple corresponding authors on a paper than were academics in other countries, according to a new analysis. My latest for @nature.com: www.nature.com/articles/d41...
6d
21d
From 2016 to 2020, almost one-third of papers by authors in China had multiple corresponding authors — but policy reforms are expected to have dampened the trend.
go.nature.com
21d
What’s behind China’s historically high counts of corresponding authors?
27d
8d
5d
The preprint server is the latest to impose stiff penalties on authors who contribute to AI ‘slop’ — but not everyone is convinced it’s the right approach.
www.nature.com
Nature
Nature
C&EN (Chemical & Engineering News)
C&EN (Chemical & Engineering News)
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban
The preprint server is the latest to impose stiff penalties on authors who contribute to AI ‘slop’ — but not everyone is convinced it’s the right approach.
www.nature.com
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban
Chemistry World
Dalmeet Singh Chawla
Dalmeet Singh Chawla
Dalmeet Singh Chawla
Dalmeet Singh Chawla
Dalmeet Singh Chawla
Analysis poses tough questions on who should receive more funding - younger researchers or older ones?
www.chemistryworld.com
Scientists produce more novel but less disruptive work as they age
The preprint server is the latest to impose stiff penalties on authors who contribute to AI ‘slop’ — but not everyone is convinced it’s the right approach.
go.nature.com
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban
www.nature.com
From 2016 to 2020, almost one-third of papers by authors in China had multiple corresponding authors — but policy reforms are expected to have dampened the trend.
What’s behind China’s historically high counts of corresponding authors?
Analysis poses tough questions on who should receive more funding - younger researchers or older ones?
www.chemistryworld.com
Scientists produce more novel but less disruptive work as they age