//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
Study of 8M biomed & life science articles finds those led by women spent 7 to 15 days longer in review than those led by men. Over a career, women's papers could spend 350 to 750 additional days in review. Delays could slow promotion, esp to full professor. www.the-scientist.com/women-s-rese...
A study of millions of life science papers revealed that manuscripts with women in key authorship roles spent longer between submission and acceptance.
Peer Review Timelines Show Gender Gap, Large Study Reports
www.the-scientist.com
3mo
Amy Diehl, Ph.D.