//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts






Loading...
When zoning is not a constraint, development charges are paid by homebuyers in the form of higher housing prices. The tax reduces developer demand for land, which reduces the supply of housing, resulting in higher prices.
8h
Michael Wiebe
Misconception: development charges are paid by developers. Fact: development charges are paid by landowners (and by renters and homebuyers, when they make projects infeasible and reduce housing supply).
Incredible stuff happening in New Zealand. This report proposes a legal framework where going over an objective threshold of housing scarcity (a premium on higher-density land prices) would trigger *automatic* upzoning.
🚨Land value tax alert🚨 How does LVT work in a general equilibrium supply and demand model of land and housing? It shifts down both the supply and demand for land, reducing the after-tax land price. The effect on developers is a wash, so the housing market is unchanged.
2d
14h
Sweet, sweet non-distortionary taxation!
1d