//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
MSCA DSTrain Postdoc @biovitenskap.bsky.social | Guest researcher @UGent | Conservation photojournalist | Researching function & evolution of vertebrates colored integument | https://www.jonathangoldenberg.com
Jonathan Goldenberg
Loading...
Such a great team on this 😎 @jessica-dobson.bsky.social @gdebruyn.bsky.social @michaelnicolai.bsky.social @lilianadalba.bsky.social & all others not here
So we checked this using reflectance data across UV, visible, and near‑infrared from 300+ species (🐦🐻 🐊 🐍🐢🕷️🥚)
I am hiring a postdoc for scRNA-seq research in Lund, Sweden on the visual systems of non-model inverts as part of an ERC project on the evolution and ecology of advanced color and polarization vision. Apply here or share the link with someone who may be interested! 🧪 lu.varbi.com/en/what:job/...
Result? UV-visible reflectance plays nicely together, but visible-near IR breaks the rules. And does so differently across taxa. Visual signals and thermal properties don’t have to be on speaking terms.