//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts






Loading...
We show that the joint problem boils down to two steps: 1. Infer closed-loop parameters (which can be done efficiently with SSM methods ✅) 2. Derive equations relating the parameters of interest in setting the closed-loop dynamics. See our paper (also on arXiv, link above) for details!
6mo
Inferring both the system dynamics *and* the control objective from partial observations is inherently ill-posed. Characterizing the exact (non-)identifiability and identifying how to perform inference was the challenge!
Assuming known environments or costs is reasonable in engineered systems, but maybe less so for intelligent agents in complex worlds. A year later, I see this as clarifying how unobserved objectives and dynamics interact to produce a continuum of explanations, and which perturbations are needed.