//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
I hear you, but "the legal profession" is overbroad. #NotAllMembersOfTheLegalProfession If I were going to put money on which group would have a higher % of strong voices out there in 2027 or 2029 making the case for Supreme Court reform, lawyers vs Democratic politicians, I'd put money on lawyers.
3d
Joey Fishkin
Important to remember that the legal profession will never take the lead on Supreme Court reform. Its leaders have too much invested in the notion that the Court is fundamentally Good and Right, and that solving for the real-world consequences of its worst decisions is someone else’s problem.
3d
Jay Willis
"Court-packing would create a slippery slope to the destruction of judicial review...To the extent Callais is a problem, it can be better addressed by steps such as banning gerrymandering. There are also better remedies for various other shortcomings of the Court," writes @ilyasomin.bsky.social.
3d
To the extent Callais is a problem, it can be better addressed by steps such as banning gerrymandering.
www.lawfaremedia.org
Why Callais Doesn’t Justify Court-Packing
Lawfare