//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...








Loading...
This is my burner account.
Ματθίας Γκρεμοχωριός
I hate that it's come to this but I might have to start trying the discover feed on main because the chronological feed is getting inundated by a small number of people who will retweet literally anything to the point it's getting unusable.
god i wish i had tenure so i could openly ridicule my tenured and tenure track colleagues for using ai
This thread brought to you by me trying out some of the more janky games provided as part the Nintendo Switch Online service and wondering how much people actually paid for these things back in the day.
I think the kids complaining about $80 games today probably a bit overwrought.
In the same catalogue Super Mario 2 (the US version which was a reskinned Doki Doki Panic) was sold for $39.95 USD, which is $96.97 in today's money.
People have been studying language and grammar the analog way since the dawn of human history and there's something consoling and therapeutic in that.
I need to do more investigation but the Italian version of Athenaze may possibly be an unexploited mine of potential future wojak memes.
This game sold for $29.95 USD in the 1991 Sears holiday catalogue, which is $72.70 USD today.
Doing philology is giving me solace when the world is very stupid right now.
1d
4d
7d
7d
7d
8d
1d
7d