//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileHeaderAlt
by @jakesimonds.com
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
effort + coffee = software. See also @[email protected]
peterb from Tea Leaves Programming





Loading...
A lot of people don't know that Pittsburgh has a contemporary art platform dedicated to Black culture, but the Carnegie Library does. www.carnegielibrary.org/staff-picks/... (tagging @opg.bsky.social and @chrisbriem.bsky.social for local interest)
Normalize talking about code with less precision. Less precision is often good. The entire point of a function is to allow us to think about code with less precision, and thus accomplish more. Yes, sometimes you need precision. Often, it just gets in the way.
I'm not saying this is an unforgivable sin, and I wouldn't phrase it in exactly these words, but it is one of the less pleasant parts of using Haskell.
The extent to which the best use of coding agents is "Fix the deficiencies of the platform's terrible tooling" cannot be overstated.
The addition of ludicrous numbers of imports will continue until morale improves.
I have bad news for Dan Jurgens about what “gunsel” actually means. @gwillow.me can you tell him? (This is a very common editorial fail, because of The Maltese Falcon)