Addendum: LLMs cannot provide an assessment and therefore not a review. Don't make LLMs do what they can't do.
Read the full (but still very short) text here: medium.com/@adamlopez.n...
3. A review serves multiple purposes and should reflect those purposes – you are writing reviews to help authors improve their work, and to help chairs make decisions.
Want to help shape a more inclusive ACL community?
Our current board includes @zeerak.bsky.social , Christine de Kock, Fatma Elsafoury, Chi-kiu Lo and @santosh-tyss.bsky.social We are always looking for passionate people to join our community.
Reach out to us [email protected]/ equicl.org
Thank you to the fab people who've given feedback on the piece: @annarogers.bsky.social @gavina.bsky.social @yanai.bsky.social @gattanasio.cc John Vines and Margot Mieskes <3
2. A review is an assessment of that argument – this is not an adversarial process, you're giving an assessment and feedback!
Briefly they are:
1. A scientific paper is an argument for a position – e.g., you believe something to be correct and validate your belief